GEORGINA CECILIA PÉREZ
  • HOME
  • TXSBOE News 2021
    • TXSBOE News 2020
    • TXSBOE News 2019
    • TXSBOE News 2018
    • TXSBOE News 2017
  • Purple Apple
  • Education Policy
  • Truth in Charters
  • Ethnic Studies
    • African American Studies
    • Mexican American Studies
    • Why Ethnic Studies: the data
  • TEKS REVIEW & INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS
    • TEKS & Instructional Materials
    • Public Comment
  • Rule Changes
  • Initiatives
    • Back2School
    • Building Libraries
    • Cotton Valley Scholars
    • Difference-Maker Awards
    • Dual Language
    • Every Student Every Day
    • GSA Student Pantries
    • International Baccalaureate
    • Learning Outside of the Classroom >
      • LOC - Cross Curricular
      • LOC - Culture & Fine Arts
      • LOC - Humanities and Literature
      • LOC - Language Learning
      • LOC - Physical Education
      • LOC - Pre-K
      • LOC - Social Studies
      • LOC - Special Needs
      • LOC - STEM
      • LOC - Virtual Field Trips
    • Path2Diploma
    • Texas' Long-Range Plan for Public Education
    • Texas Student Civic Engagement
    • The Mentorship Program
    • Trustee Breakfast
  • Useful Resources
  • Photo Gallery
    • 2020 Photos
    • 2019 Photos
    • 2018 Photos
    • 2017 Photos
    • 2016 Photos
  • About Gina
    • Endorsements
  • CONTRIBUTE TODAY
Picture

Purple Apple

by Georgina C. Pérez

"The time is always right to do what is right." ~MLK

6/23/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
After several years, the involvement of numerous community organizations, and leaders at all levels of government, Robert E. Lee Road is now Buffalo Soldiers Road.

It has taken the State of Texas until 2019 to write that slavery was the central cause of the Civil War in our history curriculum; until 2020, to adopt an African American Studies course, and longer to remove Confederate plaques and monuments honoring the names and actions of slave traders, defenders of slavery, and traitors to our nation.

On June 23, El Paso City Council accepted my $1,500 donation dedicated to offset renaming expenses and voted to change the name to Buffalo Soldiers Road. This endeavor joins the efforts of Fort Bliss' Buffalo Soldier Gate and meets the Buffalo Soldier Monument commemorating the 1870 expedition by the all African American 9th Calvary that had a substantial presence on Fort Bliss.

As a community, we find ourselves in a pivotal moment where the opportunity to be actively anti-racist and work for equality is before us. We are called to respond, to improve life as we know it today, and leave the world always in a better state than which we found it.

As the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. said, “The time is always right to do what is right,” and that time is now. We can all begin by treating people with dignity, courtesy, and respect. Changing this street name to Buffalo Soldiers Road is a small step in the right direction.

Picture
0 Comments

Where's the 5%?  Your tax dollars are going to Private Schools

6/5/2020

0 Comments

 
The largest portion of CARES Act Funding (under ESSER) will almost entirely be used to replace some of the funding ISDs would have normally received (which are State funds) in a non-pandemic year. Texas is using ESSER as a piggy bank because state revenue (sales tax) has plunged due to COVID19 as have the the oil and gas taxes.
See Q & A #8 (page 11) on this TEA document:
CARES Act Funding and COVID Expense Reimbursement FAQ June 4, 2020
https://tea.texas.gov/sites/default/files/covid/COVID-19-CARES-Act-Funding-and-Expense-Reimbursement-FAQ.pdf

Is all this CARES Act money from the feds going to supplement ADA funding flows or is it only to reimburse specific expenditures by specific schools? Posted May 28, 2020Currently there are two large funding streams from the CARES Act that will impact K-12 education in the state. (There are also several smaller funding streams.) The ESSER fund flows to school districts. A portion of the ESSER fund would supplement expected FSP funding in district budgets (roughly 5% of the ESSER formula total per LEA, which would be used to cover any requested private school equitable services, but if no/fewer requests are received, would be extra funding for any lawful purpose). The remainder will be used as a source of funds for the Foundation School Program ADA Hold Harmless, and so would not be supplemental funding.The CRF is a reimbursement program. These are supplemental funds to school districts, intended to cover extra COVID-19 expenses.
Much like FEMA, 75% of additional costs due to Coronavirus expenses (which occurred between March 1 - May 20, 2020) can be reimbursed via CRF. However, there is a maximum reimbursement limit equal to $50,000 or $250 per low-income student (whichever amount is higher).
See Q & A #2 (page 12) on this TEA document:
CARES ACT – Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF)
https://tea.texas.gov/sites/default/files/covid/COVID-19-CARES-Act-Funding-and-Expense-Reimbursement-FAQ.pdf

How much reimbursement can we anticipate receiving under CRF? Posted May 21, 2020LEAs will be eligible for up to 75% of additive expenses incurred as of close of business May 20, 2020, to be reimbursed subject to a cap per LEA described below, and subject to CRF funding availability as described below. Each LEA will be capped at a reimbursement amount equal to the greater of $50,000 or an amount equal to $250 per compensatory education (SCE) student in the LEA. This would allow for every LEA, regardless of size or SCE student count, to receive at least $50,000 assuming they incurred at least $67,000 in underlying reimbursable expenses. For LEAs with more than 200 SCE students, their reimbursement would be capped at an amount equal to $250 per SCE student.

*ESSER: The Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief  (formula funding for emergency relief)

The 5% is going to private schools and virtual education vendors. How much is 5% ? Let's assume a local ISD is expecting to recover $10M in CARES funding, 5% of this is $500,000.

Based on this guidance from the Texas Education Agency, the ISD hoping to recover $10M, must use $500K - of their CARES funding - to pay for services requested by private non-profit schools within district boundaries. If there are none,  ISDs can spend 100% of ESSER funds. See TEA link above  p9, Q31

Federal stimulus funding appropriated by Congress to help states and school districts deal with the effects of the coronavirus pandemic could find its way into the coffers of private schools and virtual education vendors.
The Texas Education Agency published new guidance on CARES Act funding for school districts on May 21, 2020. Confirming the state’s decision to abide by the direction from Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos to expand eligibility for equitable services, the agency explains in its FAQ document that school districts must use their stimulus funding to offer equitable services to all private nonprofit schools within the attendance zone. TEA adds that the district must provide the services, as chosen by the private school, to any of the private schools who opt to participate. Under this guidance, school districts would not be forced to send the stimulus money directly to the private school for its own discretionary use, but the districts would have to pay for services requested by the private school. 

Teach the Vote
https://www.teachthevote.org/news/2020/05/20/texas-signals-it-may-send-federal-k-12-dollars-to-private-schools/
0 Comments

Rural Education Updates from the U.S. Department of Education

3/20/2020

0 Comments

 
Over the last few weeks, the White House, the Department of Education, and other federal agencies have released a significant amount of guidance to support schools, educators, and families regarding COVID-19 (Coronavirus). For updated information, please visit Coronavirus.gov, CDC.gov/coronavirus, and USA.gov/coronavirus.
For education-related information, the Department has established a dedicated Coronavirus webpage (ed.gov/coronavirus), which includes resources for institutions of higher education and for K-12.
  • The website includes guidance for students at institutions of higher education, and covers Coronavirus-related scenarios that could impact students who are enrolled in study abroad programs, students who meet full-time requirements but fall below 12 credit hours, students who are quarantined and miss class, campuses that have temporarily stopped offering ground-based classes to prevent the spread of Coronavirus, and foreign schools that serve Americans who receive Federal financial aid. 
  • Also see a letter from the Office for Civil Rights that addresses potential discrimination associated with coronavirus.
The Department has provided additional information for families and communities including:
  • Information regarding certain flexibilities under the Every Student Succeeds Act, or “ESSA;”
  • Information regarding services to children with disabilities;
  • A fact sheet from our Office for Civil Rights on the risk of Coronavirus in schools while protecting the civil rights of students; and a short webinar on Online Education and Website Accessibility.
  • Information on the Family Education Records Privacy Act, or “FERPA,” as it pertains to K-12 and higher education students.
  • Information for Accrediting Agencies Regarding Temporary Flexibilities Provided to Coronavirus Impacted Institutions or Accrediting Agencies.
The Department will continue to update its website, ed.gov/coronavirus. Please direct education related questions to COVID-19@ed.gov.

0 Comments

TEXAS TEMPORARILY SUSPENDS OPEN MEETING LAWS

3/16/2020

0 Comments

 
16 March 2020 | Governor’s Office Clears Path for Gov­ern­men­tal Bod­ies to Meet Tele­phon­i­cal­ly or by Videoconferencing Dur­ing Coro­n­avirus Disaster

Governor Abbott’s office today approved a request by the Office of the Attorney General to temporarily suspend a limited number of open meeting laws in response to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) disaster. This action will allow governmental bodies to conduct meetings by telephone or video conference to advance the public health goal of limiting face-to-face meetings (also called “social distancing”) to slow the spread of the Coronavirus (COVID-19).  

Importantly, however, this action does not suspend requirements that governmental bodies conduct meetings in a transparent and accessible manner. Specifically, governmental bodies are still be required to do the following: 

  • provide online written notice containing a public toll-free dial-in number or a free-of-charge videoconference link, as well as an electronic copy of any agenda packet, before conducting telephonic or video conference meetings;  
  • provide the public with access and a means to participate in those meetings, preferably through two-way audio or video connections; and  
  • provide the public with access to a recording of those meetings.   

Read the Attorney General's notification:
www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/governors-office-clears-path-governmental-bodies-meet-telephonically-or-videoconference-during
0 Comments

TXSBOE1 REQUEST TO TEA: POSTPONE / WAIVE STAAR, EOC, and TELPAS

3/14/2020

0 Comments

 
Our students are out for extended periods of time due to COVID-19 precautionary measures. While these efforts go a very long way to protect our communities, our students and teachers need the same protections applied to accountability.

Whether it's poverty or lack of resources, many communities along the border (and across Texas) do not have access to wifi and do not possess digital devices necessary for online learning. This means our students whose promotion, retention, and graduation is based on test scores are at great risk. 

Our nation, state, and cities across the U.S. have declared emergency. Holding our students and teachers responsible for continued learning in the current situation is irresponsible and unnecessary. 

16 March 2020 | Governor Abbott Waives STAAR Testing Requirements
https://tea.texas.gov/sites/default/files/Governor%20Abbott%20Waives%20STAAR%20Testing%20Requirements.pdf
Picture
0 Comments

SCHOOLS' CURBSIDE FOOD SERVICE

3/13/2020

0 Comments

 
13 March - The waivers between the Texas Department of Agriculture and the their U.S. counterparts allowing federal reimbursement for non-school based food service should be in place by Monday, 16 March 2020 - (i.e., your curbside food service).

13 March | Letter from USDA

https://tea.texas.gov/sites/default/files/TDA%20COVID19%20RESPONSE%20NonCongregate%20and%20School%20Sites%202020.pdf

0 Comments

African American Studies is on the November Agenda

11/5/2019

0 Comments

 

You're Invited to the TXSBOE Public Hearing on African American Studies!

The Texas State Board of Education is scheduled to hold a public hearing on the adoption of an African American Studies course on November 13th - Click here to review the agenda.  AAS will be the second addition to the Texas Ethnic Studies course catalog. Click here to review the course and submit your public comment. 

Sign Up to testify here.
0 Comments

C-Scope 2.0

10/7/2019

0 Comments

 
The Texas Education Agency’s “Texas Resource Review” (TRR), formerly known as the Instructional Materials Quality Review (IMQR), has received a great deal of criticism, and rightfully so. Here’s why:

  1. Democracy. The TRR removes the public voice from Instructional Material reviews. The TRR does not, however, relinquish the taxpayer dollars. You may be asking yourself, “Where is the public input now?” The Texas State Board of Education requires all materials to be online and at your local Education Service Center. The TXSBOE also solicits public input from their respective districts as well as input via phone call, email, USPS, and fax, which is reviewed by all Members. We also hold public hearings. Anyone can listen via livestream, where anyone can attend in-person, or in the hearing room, and speak their piece. The Texas State Board of Education is the public’s access to public education.
  2. Participation. Since the quality review process began in 2017, fewer than 3% of Texas ISD’s are participating in this costly experiment.  
  3. Twice the effort, what's the result? Why should taxpayers bear the burden of costly reviews, twice? The easy answer is - they shouldn’t. So which one should the state use? That’s an easy answer, too, but, elected officials, ISD leadership, nor taxpayers get to decide. For now, you will fund both: one that ISDs prefer and one they do not. 
  4. Ranking. One of the biggest criticisms of the TEA’s quality review continues to receive focuses on the ranking of materials. A handful of individuals selected by The New Teacher Project (with oversight from EdReports, contracted by SAFAL) were all set to give stars to materials based on a set of indicators.

Here is some critical information that taxpayers should know:
  • The New Teacher Project has no experience reviewing instructional materials in Texas, or anywhere else. 
  • EdReports has only worked on Common Core materials, which are illegal in Texas. EdReports uses its preexisting scorecards to grade Texas materials. In other words, EdReports is using a scorecard made for materials that are illegal in Texas.
  • SAFAL has several contracts with TEA and several quality issues, which have resulted in reduced payments. 

5. More Stars = Better Quality. The issue then becomes the definition of quality. A textbook that received a high score (or more stars) is considered “high-quality.” However, Texas students have a wide range of needs. For example, a Dual Language academy may not find textbooks that do not support Language Learners or Biliteracy as high quality. Will the Board of Trustees at your ISD purchase books and technology which are best for their community? Or will they purchase what TEA says is good stuff?

6. The Law. “The commissioner by rule shall establish the procedure by which a publisher may submit instructional materials for inclusion in the web portal.” 
see: Texas Education Code Sec. 31.081 https://texas.public.law/statutes/tex._educ._code_section_31.081

The web portal is the TRR (or the IMQE). The intent behind the law was to have a review of Open Educational Resources (OERs), which are freely accessible, openly licensed text, media, and other digital assets that are useful for teaching, learning, and assessing as well as for research purposes. 

However, the ambiguity in the statute and the lack of oversight of TEA has resulted in this:

"At the request of a single member of the Texas State Board of Education or 10% of ISD’s, a publisher must submit their materials to the Quality Review."

Please note that in no place in Texas statute does a single member of an elected body have this kind of power. Many of the TXSBOE Members stood against this TEA Rule. However, Commissioner Morath has the final say. 

The Texas State Board of Education nor the Texas Education Agency determines the best method to teach. Equally, neither should the TEA or the TXSBOE rank or score textbooks and technology. 

​It seems that TEA is placing itself on a path to accomplish what C-Scope could not. ​
0 Comments

Texas celebrates its 25-year relationship with charters... still no democracy or public accountability in sight.

8/27/2019

0 Comments

 
If there is anyone still doubting that charter operators in Texas (and across the nation) receive every economic and political advantage, please take a moment to watch the 14 June 2019, Public Hearings at the Texas State Board of Education. Plan for several hours of your day to watch the hearings in their entirety (click here). Or, you can watch the condensed version below:
"I have six pages of questions for you." Here are the Teacher's Notes: (click here for the 6-page PDF)
  1. Extensive communication from a Superintendent can result in TEA revising the charter application. 
  2. Charter operators detail exactly how they will cherry-pick their students on their applications. English Learners and students with Special and Specific Needs are listed at dramatically lower percentages than surrounding ISD campuses. 
  3. Charter Boards of Managers do not resemble the community the charter occupies. Often, boards do not reflect any community in the nation. 
  4. Conflicts of interest are not a concern when democracy is not a requirement. 
  5. Students with disciplinary histories or records are not allowed to attend. But, your tax dollars are!
  6. State credentialed teachers are not required by law, therefore are not hired. It's a great cost savings for charter operators. Our students and communities pay the price. 

Today, the Texas Education Agency is asking for public input on the Generation 25 Charter Application:
"The commissioner, in conjunction with staff in the Division of Charter School Administration, is in the final phase of preparing for the release of the Generation Twenty-Five open-enrollment charter application this fall.  In the past, some of you have provided input regarding the content of the charter application and/or the commissioner’s charter authorization process.  Our office welcomes any input that you may have to help strengthen the charter application process as we incorporate statutory changes and other edits to this iteration of the application.  
 
Should you need to reference last year’s application, the Generation Twenty-Four charter application is still available on the TEA website for reference.  If you would like to provide input into the Generation Twenty-Five charter application process, please submit any suggested edits and/or recommendations to charterschools@tea.texas.gov by Wednesday, September 4, 2019."
In January 2019, the Texas State Board of Education passed policy intending to require public hearings on Charter Contact Amendments and Expansions, which is how existing charters multiply.
TXSBOE policy intends to gather public input on charter expansions

However, the Texas Legislature decided that a website that exists in obscurity is sufficient. Now taxpayers are told where their public education dollars are being siphoned to online rather than by surprise when taxpayer-funded buildings go up (without a bond vote like ISDs perform, by law). Did you know that when a charter defaults on their building loans, you pay the debt - and the charter keeps the building?  

My office continues to work on making these applicants follow the law, and the applications equitable to the lawful and righteous efforts which ISD's must perform and provide effective educational opportunities to all students. However, applicants regularly submit false information based on their cherry-picking and segregationist abilities. This ability results in ISD Superintendents forced to extensively communicate with TEA and attend public hearings to dispute the falsehoods told by charter applicants. More often than not, to no avail. 
Please note: 
a) New charter operators are approved solely by the TEA Commissioner of Education. The Texas State Board of Education may veto these annual approvals. 

b) Charter Amendments and Expansions are approved solely by the TEA Education Commissioner. In fewer than seven years, more than 400 expansions have been approved without public hearings, without taxpayer input, without community voices. ​
0 Comments

3 Reasons ISD Trustees should "Say No" to TEA's IMQE

4/13/2019

0 Comments

 
What is the IMQE?  The Instructional Materials Quality Evaluation is TEA's expensive solution in search of a problem. The conflict? The IMQE is funded by taxpayer dollars which should be going to ISD's - so our local educators can determine which instructional materials are best for our children.  

Reason #1: Fiduciary duty
As elected officials, we have a fiduciary duty to ensure that the state is spending Texas taxpayer dollars in a manner that provides the best value to the state. The Texas Education Agency (TEA) has paid Safal Partners $3.26M for a one-year contract ending in August 2019. Safal subcontracted EdReports to produce quality evaluations or reviews.  EdReports has never reviewed Texas materials, they have always only worked on Common Core. 
  • No reviews were published by the September 2018 deadline (as mandated by law).
  • No reviews were published in time to be useful to districts for the K-8 ELAR adoption, and 
  • Only 21 reviews will be published by May 2019, which is after districts have made their selection decisions.  

As elected officials, we also have a duty to invest taxpayers’ dollars in doing what is right for students, not in something no one really wants. 
The IMQE is also referred to as the "Portal" is NOT something school districts want, as evidenced by the struggle TEA had in getting districts to participate in the pilot.  Only 30 of 1,023 ISD's are participating in the IMQE Pilot. 

On November 13, 2018, the Urban Curriculum Council, representing 13 of the state’s largest districts sent a letter opposing this project. Three points of that letter: 
  1. The IMQE is not a project that members of the UCC or others from the field have requested as something that meets the needs of the students in our districts; it is a project initiated by the Texas Education Agency;
  2. The IMQE is not needed as the Texas State Board of Education TEKS alignment process appropriately and adequately supports school districts in reviewing instructional materials. *The TXSBOE process is also the means to public input via teacher workgroups and public hearings;
  3. Once the TEKS alignment is determined by the TXSBOE process, districts use their own processes to make the best selection for their students. 

Each community has its own set of unique needs. The definition of High Quality in El Paso may not match the definition of High Quality in Lufkin. 


Reason #2: Using Common Core (EdReports and LA Believes) to review Texas instructional materials
It’s illegal for Texas to adopt the Common Core standards and it’s illegal for Texas schools to teach the Common Core standards. Safal’s contract states that existing EdReports’ reviews (which are exclusively Common Core) will be used on the reviews of Texas instructional materials.

Page 25 of 229 of TEA’s contract with Safal includes an "Updated Statement of Work" (revised as of July 3, 2018), which reiterates Safal’s proposal: 

Teacher review teams will use existing EdReports reviews to identify which evidence applies to the Texas rubric.
*Review the contract here: TEA Contract #3854, SAFAL Partners

It is illegal for Texas schools to teach the Common Core. Nevertheless, the TEA awarded this contract for quality reviews to an entity that told us they will use portions of its EdReports and Louisiana Believes’ existing reviews of Common Core materials for the Texas reviews.  

EdReports and Louisiana Believes’ reviews of Common Core materials are already available on public websites.  EdReports will cut and paste from their existing reviews to produce reviews of Texas materials. Why are Texas taxpayers paying millions of dollars for something we could get for free?


Reason #3: Why is Texas following Louisiana’s model?
TEA has stated that they are modeling the IMQE process after Louisiana’s process.
  • According to Forbes July 2018 Report, Texas is ranked 36 in school quality. Louisiana is ranked 50;​
  • U.S. News ranks Texas 33rd for our Prek-12 education system;  Louisiana is ranked 49th. 

Why would TEA want Texas to follow Louisiana's lead?
0 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>
    Notify Me

    Author

    Georgina C. Pérez
    Texas State Board of Education District 1

    The state does not provide  funding for an office nor staff. Please consider supporting TXSBOE1
    ~ Working for You!


    RSS Feed

    Archives

    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    March 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    August 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018

Thank for visiting my campaign website. If your intention was to visit my official Texas State Board of Education website,
please visit https://tea.texas.gov/about-tea/leadership/state-board-of-education/sboe-board-members/sboe-member-district-1

(915) 261-8663 | georgina.perez@tea.texas.gov

If you would like to send a campaign contribution by mail, please address it to:
Georgina C. Pérez, 1605 George Dieter #582, El Paso, Texas 79936.


  • HOME
  • TXSBOE News 2021
    • TXSBOE News 2020
    • TXSBOE News 2019
    • TXSBOE News 2018
    • TXSBOE News 2017
  • Purple Apple
  • Education Policy
  • Truth in Charters
  • Ethnic Studies
    • African American Studies
    • Mexican American Studies
    • Why Ethnic Studies: the data
  • TEKS REVIEW & INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS
    • TEKS & Instructional Materials
    • Public Comment
  • Rule Changes
  • Initiatives
    • Back2School
    • Building Libraries
    • Cotton Valley Scholars
    • Difference-Maker Awards
    • Dual Language
    • Every Student Every Day
    • GSA Student Pantries
    • International Baccalaureate
    • Learning Outside of the Classroom >
      • LOC - Cross Curricular
      • LOC - Culture & Fine Arts
      • LOC - Humanities and Literature
      • LOC - Language Learning
      • LOC - Physical Education
      • LOC - Pre-K
      • LOC - Social Studies
      • LOC - Special Needs
      • LOC - STEM
      • LOC - Virtual Field Trips
    • Path2Diploma
    • Texas' Long-Range Plan for Public Education
    • Texas Student Civic Engagement
    • The Mentorship Program
    • Trustee Breakfast
  • Useful Resources
  • Photo Gallery
    • 2020 Photos
    • 2019 Photos
    • 2018 Photos
    • 2017 Photos
    • 2016 Photos
  • About Gina
    • Endorsements
  • CONTRIBUTE TODAY